Home
Water
Waste
Energy
   
  
Login
Register
RSS   RSS  |  About Us  |  Advertise
 Home 
|
 News 
|
 Jobs 
|
 Supplier Directory 
|
 edie+ 
|
 Training 
|
 Awards 
|
 Events 
|
 Tenders 
|
 Networking 
|
 Webinars 
 Latest | Search | Archives | News by email | Newsfeeds | Blogs | On this day...
 Jobs Home Page | Search | Latest | Jobs by email | Post a job
 Add new company | Edit company details | Search | Make enquiry | Advertise
 Latest | Search | Email alerts | Subscribe | About
 Course Calendar | Adhoc Courses | Search courses | Submit a course | Edit or submit a course | Change training company
 All events | Search / Browse Events | Submit your event
 Search | Email updates | Recent Tenders | Submit Tender
 Networking Home | Videos | Audio | Photos | Blogs | Sets | Members | Groups | Message Board
  • home
  • my home
  • videos
  • audio
  • photos
  • blogs
  • sets
  • members
  • groups
  • message board
  • add a blog post
  • my blog
  • most recent
  • highest rated
  • most viewed
  • top favorites
  • most comments
advanced
  • video
  • audio
  • photo
  • blog
  • member
  • group
  • message
  • sets
  • pages

Turn off 4,500 lights or switch on one variable speed drive…. Which would you prefer?

Here we go again. The Independent on Sunday (18th July 2010) has just written a lead news item with the headline: UK’s emissions could be cut at the flick of a switch. Why do I know what’s coming? Yet another article applauding the concept that switching off the lights will save the planet. Don’t get me wrong. Anything that reduces CO2 emissions is a good thing. And when you consider the eye-watering statistics revealed by the article (“...turning electrical appliances off at the mains and installing energy-efficient light bulbs could slash the UK’s carbon dioxide emissions by about 40 megatonnes a year*”) I am definitely a supporter of the lights-off concept.

 

But there is just as compelling a CO2 message that really deserves the big national headlines, yet does not seem to be getting through. Take a look at these statistics: a single 110 kW motor without any form of speed control consumes 770,880 kWh per year when running for 8,760 hours**. This is the same as running 6,111 high efficiency light bulbs. However, if you add a simple variable speed control device to the same motor, the energy consumption falls to 376,189 kWh per year, which is the same as running 2,689 energy saving light bulbs.

 

Therefore adding ONE variable speed drive to ONE electric motor can be the same as switching off 3,422 low voltage light bulbs. How amazing is that!

 

So why is it that, of the estimated 10 million electric motor population in the UK, only 5 percent have variable speed drives applied? There really is no logical reason.

 

These are the typical electric motors found, for example, throughout the water industry. It is only during the last five years that the effect of weather patterns has started to filter down as to the likely impact on the water cycle. And already it is affecting the way water is managed. The more that the water cycle is managed, the more energy intensive it becomes. The more that is pumped the more energy is used. The more sewage removed, the more methane is generated.

 

As such some 4 to 6% of the world’s greenhouse gases come from the water industry. A typical water company consumes around 270 GWh a year, 80 percent of its usage (over 215 GWh) is from the pumping of water and sewage. And it is in the speed control of pump motors where variable speed drives can have their biggest impact.

 

These are figures that urgently need to be addressed through energy efficient pumping. So come on Nationals, give some exposure to the big CO2 savers.

 

 

*40 megatonnes of CO2 is equivalent to the annual CO2 produced by 7 million houses in the UK.

**ABB has just created a good old traditional slide rule that offers a rule-of-thumb measure of just what you can save by switching a direct-on-line motor to variable speed control. To order, email energy@gb.abb.com ref. 'slide rule'.

  • Email to Friends
    Add Blog Post
  • Flag
  • Log in to rate.
    Comments: 3
    Views: 1588

Comments

Please log in to enter comments.
  • David raises some good points and it is true that the kW rating and the number of hours a motor runs will directly impact upon the energy savings when fitting a drive - this is one of the fundamentals we survey when we perform our free energy appraisals.


    Yet, outside of industry, our energy appraisal programme continues to reveal surprising savings for many building customers. We recently installed a new HVAC system at BT’s centre for 999 calls in Nottingham, controlled by ABB drives, resulting in electricity costs reductions of 23 percent. The site has also shown a reduction in gas usage to 12 percent of the previous figure, due to better control of the HVAC system. The 18 ABB HVAC drives, ranging in size from 5.5 to 30 kW, run air handling unit supply and extract air fans at the site.


    Jackson House - an office block in Manchester – is saving over £29,000 on its annual electricity bill following the installation of ABB variable speed drives on its HVAC system. For several years Jackson House had air flow problems throughout the tenanted areas. One such problem was that the main ventilation plant’s fans were running constantly at full speed. The plant consists of four fans, ranging from 45 to 120 kW; two for supply and two for extraction. The block also has a variable temperature heating system comprising four pumps; two duty pumps and two stand-by pumps, also running at full speed.


    For the air handling fans, installing ABB HVAC drives on each of the four fans resulted in a 49% energy saving. This equates to annual cost savings of between £4,000 and £10,700 per fan, depending on rating, giving a total saving for the air handling unit of £27,914 per annum. The payback period is about 11 months. I would be more than happy to offer David or any other building FM a FREE energy appraisal.

    S_Ruddell, 2 years ago | Flag
  • I agree with 110kW motor such savings are possible but for the buildings I help with over 150,000sq.m the largest is one 30kW motor which is on less than 1000 hrs a year. Away from industry (incl Water)most motors are arround the 0.5-4kW and switched off when not in use. Using VSD's then becomes borderline. We are putting them in slowly but lighting for us offers as good if not better opportunities when including the costs of controls required to get the best out of Variable speed drives.


    David Oldham


    Energy manager 

    dpo, 2 years ago | Flag
  • I would agree that the figures you are quoting here are amazing (and I am going on trust because I don't know enough about the topic to agree or disagree with the numbers), what's not amazing however is the fact that so few members of the general population are talking about - or even aware of the difference just one variable speed drive would make.


    And why are the 'Nationals' NOT talking about, erm..., electric motor management? or is it variable speed drives? or is it water pump energy efficiency? Well that's it in a nutshell really - it's a difficult concept to get across, it's not 'sexy'. It's not as cool as giving the equivalent saving in 'lightblulbs' for example.

    Andrew Thornhill, 2 years ago | Flag
Uploaded By: S_Ruddell
2 years ago
Level: Bronze
Points: 685
WA44BT , United Kingdom
Tags:
abb drives
drives
electric motor
energy & carbon
energy saving
motors
pumps
variable speed drives

Category: energy & carbon

Groups: AMP/plus


  • Related
  • Latest
  • Highest Rated
  • Most Viewed
  • Government and business in the ring for a FITS Fight
    By NWellington
    1 week ago
  • Solar not fit for subsidy
    By ChrisFarrell
    2 weeks ago
  • A Science View
    By Richard Phillips
    4 weeks ago
  • ENERGY A Science view
    By Richard Phillips
    2 months ago
  • COP17, the CDM and climate change mitigation
    By fvdppc25z
    2 months ago
  • Cuts, strikes and more cuts
    By Carys Matthews
    3 months ago
  • Energy firms ranked low in CRC carbon footprint league
    By NWellington
    3 months ago
  • MPG of an aircraft carrier?
    By seb.beloe
    4 months ago
  • Blowing carbon bubbles
    By seb.beloe
    6 months ago
  • Dig a little deeper and what do new insulation figures actually reflect?
    By lukewalsh
    6 months ago
  • Get a blog feed from S_Ruddell
  • Get a blog feed from all users

Inappropriate Flag

Flagging notifies the edie live webmaster of inappropriate content. Please flag any messages that violate the Terms of Service. Please include a short explanation why you're flagging this message. Thank you!

If you believe this content violates the Terms of Service, please write a short description why. Thank you.

Inappropriate Comment Flag

Flagging notifies the edie live webmaster of inappropriate content. Please flag any messages that violate the Terms of Service. Please include a short explanation why you're flagging this message. Thank you!

Email Friends

Your First Name (optional)

Email Addresses (comma separated)

Import friends

Message to Friends (optional)

Are you human?

Or, you can forward this blog with your own email application.

  • User-Generated Blogs by KickApps
  • Terms of Service

Terms of Service